The Ewha Medical Journal
Ewha Womans University College of Medicine and Ewha Medical Research Institute
Original Article

Sleep disorders, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life in patients with cancer in Turkey: a multi-center cross-sectional survey

Vesile Şenol1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-0527, Zekeriya Temircan2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6017-3403
1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science, Kapadokya University, Nevşehir, Turkey
2Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Kapadokya University, Nevşehir, Turkey
*Corresponding author: Zekeriya Temircan, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Kapadokya University, Kapadokya Yerleşkesi, Yeni, Nevşehir 50420, Turkey, Tel: 90-555-071-7938, Fax: 90-384-353-5125, E-mail: zekeriya.temircan@kapadokya.edu.tr

© Copyright 2024 Ewha Womans University College of Medicine and Ewha Medical Research Institute. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 19, 2023; Revised: Jan 16, 2024; Accepted: Jan 18, 2024

Published Online: Jan 31, 2024

Abstract

Objectives:

The present study aims to examine the frequency of sleep disorders and the level of sleep quality, as well as their relationship with health-related quality of life in cancer patients.

Methods:

This multi-center cross-sectional survey included 333 cancer patients ranging in age from 16 to 72 years, between June 15, 2017, and August 30, 2018 at the Ankara Oncology Hospital and Erciyes University Kemal Dedeman Oncology Hospital Polyclinic. Data were collected via various surveys conducted through face-to-face interviews, including following measurement tools: Short Form 36 Health Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Epworth Sleepiness, and the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire for obstructive sleep apnea. Face-to-face interviews were carried out with patients who presented for an initial examination or follow-up and were awaiting their appointments.

Results:

The most commonly reported sleep disorders were daytime sleepiness (36.9%), sleep respiratory disorders (34.8%), insomnia (29.4%), and parasomnias (28.8%). Good sleepers were found to have significantly higher physical (40.20±10.08 vs. 33.21±8.06; P<0.001) and mental component scores (43.54±8.25 vs. 38.20±7.52; P<0.001) than poor sleepers. Conversely, individuals with insomnia (P<0.01), daytime sleepiness (P<0.001), sleep-respiratory disorders (P<0.05), and bruxism (P<0.001) showed significantly lower scores in both physical and mental components. Additionally, those with restless legs syndrome had a significantly lower physical component score (P<0.001), and those with parasomnias had significantly lower mental component scores.

Conclusion:

Cancer patients exhibited moderate average sleep quality scores, with over half of them demonstrating low quality sleep patterns. Sleep disorders significantly impacted their health-related quality of life.

Keywords: Disorders of excessive somnolence; Neoplasms; Quality of life; Restless legs syndrome; Sleep initiation and maintenance disorders

Introduction

Background

Cancer's rising incidence, partly due to an aging population, is noteworthy. By 2030, the number of older adults with cancer is expected to increase by 67% from 2010 in the United States [1]. Advances in early detection and treatment have extended cancer patients' life expectancy. Consequently, effective treatment, minimizing treatment side effects, and improving patients' quality of life (QoL) are vital goals. Identifying factors that hinder cancer patients' daily activities, functional capacity, and QoL is crucial. Factors like pain, depression, fatigue, and sleep disorders still significantly affect their QoL [2,3].

Sleep disorders, affecting 9%–33% across ages [4], are particularly concerning for cancer patients, impairing their daily life and health-related QoL (HRQoL) [5,6]. These disorders are more severe in cancer patients due to the disease's direct impact, treatment side effects, and comorbid conditions [7]. Insomnia, a common sleep disorder, affects daily activities and is more prevalent in cancer patients (30%–69%) compared to the general adult population (30%) and elderly (23%–50%) [8]. In some cancer cases, insomnia prevalence can be as high as 30%–93% [9].

Sleep disorders and symptom burden greatly diminish older cancer patients' health, functionality, and QoL, potentially worsening disease progression and side effects [10]. Older patients with sleep disturbances face physical and psychosocial challenges, including musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal issues, anxiety, and depression [11]. Insomnia correlates with reduced daily activity, increased fall risk, and cognitive issues [12]. Factors like hospitalization, pain, treatment side effects, immune alterations, and physiological changes contribute to sleep disorders. Insomnia, combined with depression and anxiety, can adversely affect long-term QoL. It impairs immune functions by altering cytokine expression, impacting disease trajectory and mortality [13]. Insomnia is also associated with decreased natural killer cell numbers and activity due to abnormal cortisol synthesis [13,14]. Recognizing, diagnosing, and treating sleep disorders in cancer patients are essential. This helps manage disease prognosis, prevent recurrence, and enhance patient QoL. Despite their importance, sleep disorders are often overlooked in patient care.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate sleep disorders and sleep quality, along with their impact on the overall QoL, by using universally recognized measurement tools that are highly sensitive and specific. These tools were based on self-reported data and diagnostic questions administered to cancer patients.

Methods

Ethics statement

The Ethics Committee in Clinical Research on Human Subjects at Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, approved this study (Decision date and no.: 2013/232). All participants provided both verbal and written consent before data collection commenced.

Study design

This was a multi-center cross-sectional survey study. It was described according to the STROBE statement (https://www.strobe-statement.org/).

Setting

This study was conducted with 333 volunteer cancer patients ranging in age from 16 to 72 years, between June 15, 2017, and August 30, 2018. Face-to-face interviews were carried out with patients who presented at the Ankara Oncology Hospital and Erciyes University Kemal Dedeman Oncology Hospital Polyclinic for an initial examination or follow-up and were awaiting their appointments. As tools for data collection, we utilized self-administered questionnaires, scales, indexes, and a selection of diagnostic and support questions.

Participants

Participants who were unable to complete the interview and questionnaires due to medical reasons (e.g., cognitive impairment), were excluded from the study. The response rate was 90%.

Variables

Demographic data and topics of questionnaires were outcome variables.

Measurement

The research data were collected using questionnaires that addressed sociodemographic variables (8 questions), the Short Form 36 Health Questionnaire (SF-36; 11 questions) [15], the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; 19 questions), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; 8 questions) [16,17], and the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire for obstructive sleep apnea (10 questions) [18]. Additional information was obtained through questions derived from the original scales' global diagnostic criteria for insomnia (3 questions) [19], parasomnias (6 questions), restless legs syndrome (RLS; 5 questions) [20], and bruxism (3 questions). A more specific description on the measurement tools are presented in Supplement 1. Socio-demographic data was obtained from the participants that are presented in Supplement 2.

Bias

Since the subject population participated in this survey study voluntarily, there may be sampling bias. The persons who did not participated in the study, may be in worse health or a state of lack of strength.

Study size

Sample size estimations were not made since only voluntary participants were included during the limited period.

Statistical methods

The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics Standard Concurrent User V 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) software. To assess the normality of quantitative variables, the Shapiro-Wilk test was employed. Descriptive statistics for continuous numerical variables that followed a normal distribution are presented as the mean±SD. For variables that conformed to parametric assumptions, Student's t-test was utilized, while the Mann-Whitney U test was applied to those that did not. The chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used for categorical variables. Sleep disorders were converted into dichotomous (yes/no) data by employing global scale/index scores, cut-off points, and diagnostic criteria questions. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the impact of sleep disorders and sleep quality on physical and mental health QoL. In this analysis, the physical health QoL summary score (PCS) and mental health QoL summary score (MCS) were treated as dependent variables. Independent variables included the PSQI, RLS, sleep-disordered breathing, parasomnias, daytime sleepiness, and total insomnia scores. The significance level for statistical evaluation was set at P<0.05.

Results

Participants

Socio-demographic characteristics were presented in Table 1. A significant proportion of cancer patients (83.8%) reported being unemployed, non-smokers (88.8%), and non-alcohol drinkers (92.8%) 1. Regarding treatment, 25.8% of cancer patients underwent isolated chemotherapy, 1.5% received only radiotherapy, and 14.1% underwent a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of oncology patients (n=333)
Variables No. %
Gender
 Female 188 56.5
 Male 145 43.5
Age group (years), mean±SD: 50.81±11.31 (min-max:16−72)
 16−35 32 9.6
 36−45 59 17.7
 46−55 109 32.7
 56−72 133 39.9
Marital status
 Married 291 87.4
 Single/separated/widowed 42 12.6
Educational status
 Primary school 148 44.4
 Secondary and high school 103 30.9
 University 26 7.8
Monthly income (TL), mean±SD: 1,409.10±818.45 (min-max: 200−5,900)
 Low (200−1,400) 194 58.3
 Middle (1,401−5,900) 139 41.7
Active working status
 Working 54 16.2
 Not working 279 83.8
Smoking
 Yes 40 12
 No 293 88.8
Alcohol consumption
 Yes 24 7.2
 No 309 92.8
PSQI, mean±SD: 6.17±3.83
 Good sleepers (≤5 points) 136 40.8
 Poor sleepers (>5 points) 181 59.2
Stage of cancer
 Receiving treatment 261 78.3
 Completed treatment 72 21.7
Types of treatment
 Chemotherapy 86 25.8
 Radiotherapy 5 1.5
 Chemotherapy+radiotherapy 47 14.1
 Treatment for medical support 9 2.7
 Chemotherapy and medical support 80 24
 Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and medical support (e.g., pain control, intake drugs and screening) 70 21
 Surgery 48 14.4
 Unknown 36 10.8

TL, Turkish lira; PSQI , Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Download Excel Table
Main results
Number of cancer patients according to the organs or systems, and sex

When assessing the prevalence of cancer by sex, cancers of the respiratory system were the most common in men, accounting for 33.8% of cases. Cancers of the gastrointestinal system followed at 25.5%, and hematological cancers ranked third at 20.0%. In women, cancers of the breast and endocrine organs were the most prevalent, making up 41.5% of cases. Gynecological cancers, including those of the ovary, fallopian tubes, uterus, cervix, vagina, and vulva, were the second most common (18.1%), and hematological cancers were the third most common, representing 13.3% of cases.

Number of cancer patient according to organs or systems are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Distribution of cancer according to organs or systems by gender
Types of cancer No. (%) Statistical assessment
Male Female Total χ2/P
Gastrointestinal system (esophagus, stomach, duodenal, colorectal, hepatobiliary, pancreatic) cancers 37 (69.8) 16 (30.2) 53 (15.9) 17.692/<0.001
Hematological (lymphoma, leucemia, multiple myeloma, etc.) cancers 29 (53.7) 25 (46.3) 54 (16.2) 1.663/0.231
Breast-endocrine (breast, thyroid, etc.) system cancers 0 (0.0) 78 (100) 78 (23.4) 78.61/<0.001
Gynecological (ovarian, tubal, uterine, cervical, vaginal, vulvar) cancers 0 (0.0) 35 (100) 35 (10.2) 29.205/<0.001
Respiratory system (lung-bronchial, oto-rhino-laryngeal) cancers 49 (84.5) 9 (15.5) 58 (17.4) 33.434/<0.001
Other (skin and its appendages; malignant melanoma, squamous cell, orthopedic, primary bone, etc.) cancers 30 (53.6) 26 (46.4) 56 (16.8) 2.754/0.198
Download Excel Table
Ages of cancer patients

Approximately 40% of the participants were elderly. The treatments for these patients typically include chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The most common types of cancer among the elderly were breast and endocrine system cancers (including breast and thyroid) at 48.5%, respiratory system cancers (such as lung, bronchus, and oto-rhino-laryngeal) at 33.2%, and gastrointestinal system cancers (including colorectal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic) at 18.3%. Compared to other age groups, elderly participants tended to have the same types of cancers. The prevalence of sleep disorders among elderly cancer patients was as follows: daytime sleepiness in 41.3% (55 individuals), sleep-related respiratory disorders in 27% (36 individuals), insomnia in 20.3% (27 individuals), and parasomnias in 11.4% (15 individuals). It is noteworthy that RLS and bruxism were not observed as sleep disorders in this group, although they were common among other participants.

Sleep disorders

The prevalence of sleep disorders among cancer patients was presented in Table 3. While sleep disorders did not show statistically significant relationships with sex, with the exception of parasomnias, they tended to be more severe in men. Excessive daytime sleepiness (38.6% vs. 35.6%), sleep respiratory disorders (38.6% vs. 34.9%), insomnia (33.1% vs. 26.6%), parasomnias (34.5% vs. 24.5%, P=0.045), and bruxism (19.3% vs. 13.8%) were more prevalent in men than in women. Conversely, RLS, which was generally reported in 23.1% of patients, was more common in women than in men (25.5% vs. 20.0%; Table 3).

Table 3. Distribution of cancer patients with sleep disorders according to gender
Sleep disorders No. (%) χ2/P
Male Female Total
Restless legs syndrome 29 (20.0) 48 (25.5) 77 (23.1) 1.409/0.242
Insomnia 48 (33.1) 50 (26.6) 98 (29.4) 1.669/0.196
Parasomnias 50 (34.5) 46 (24.5) 96 (28.8) 4.002/0.045
Excessive daytime sleepiness 56 (38.6) 67 (35.6) 123 (36.9) 0.313/0.576
Sleep respiratory disorders 50 (34.5) 66 (35.1) 116 (34.8) 0.014/0.906
Bruxism 28 (19.3) 26 (13.8) 54 (16.2) 1.810/0.180
Download Excel Table
Sleep quality

The mean PSQI score among cancer patients was 6.17±3.83 (95% CI, 5.75−6.58; P<0.001). Of these patients, 136 (40.8%) had normal (good) sleep quality, with PSQI scores of 5 or less, while 181 (59.2%) experienced poor sleep quality, with PSQI scores ranging from 6 to 16. The mean PSQI score for men was slightly higher at 6.30±3.82, compared to 6.06±3.85 for women, although this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05; Table 1). All sleep disorders, except for parasomnias, showed significant associations with sleep quality (Table 4).

Table 4. Association between sleep disorders and level of sleep quality in cancer patients (n=333)
Sleep disorders PSQI score Level of sleep quality
Mean±SD P-value Good (PSQI: ≤5 points) Poor (PSQI: 6−16 points) Total χ2/P
 No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
Restless legs syndrome
 Yes 7.57±3.91 <0.001 32 (41.6) 45 (58.4) 77 (23.1) 6.590/0.010
 No 5.75±3.71 149 (58.2) 107(41.8) 256 (76.9)
Insomnia
 Yes 8.67±3.83 <0.001 26 (26.5) 72 (73.5) 98 (29.4) 43.331/<0.001
 No 5.12±3.32 155 (66.0) 80 (34.0) 235 (70.6)
Parasomnias
 Yes 7.09±3.96 0.005 45 (46.9) 51 (53.1) 96 (28.8) 3.032/0.090
 No 5.79±3.72 101 (42.6) 136 (57.4) 237 (71.2)
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
 Yes 7.47±3.99 <0.001 47 (38.2) 76 (61.8) 123 (36.9) 20.486/<0.001
 No 5.40±3.53 134 (63.8) 76(36.2) 210 (63.1)
Sleep respiratory disorder
 Yes 7.07±3.87 0.002 48 (41.4) 68 (58.6) 116 (34.8) 12.079/0.001
 No 5.68±3.73 133 (61.3) 84 (38.7) 217 (65.2)
Bruxism
 Yes 7.59±4.28 0.003 18 (33.3) 36 (66.7) 54 (16.2) 11.479/0.001
 No 5.89±3.68 163 (58.4) 152 (45.6) 279 (83.8)

PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Download Excel Table

Upon investigating the relationship between mean PSQI scores, sleep quality level, and sleep disorders, it was revealed that individuals experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness (36.9%) had a mean PSQI score of 7.47±3.99 (P<0.001), with 61.8% of them exhibiting poor sleep quality (χ2=12.079, P=0.001). Additionally, a significant positive association was noted between daytime sleepiness and sleep quality (χ2=20.486; P<0.001). Those with sleep-disordered breathing (34.8%) had a mean PSQI score of 8.67±3.83 (P<0.001), and 58.6% were found to have poor sleep quality (χ2=12.079, P=0.001). Participants with insomnia (29.4%) had a mean PSQI score of 8.67±3.83 (P<0.001), with 73.5% reporting poor sleep quality (χ2=43.331; P<0.001). The mean PSQI score for patients with RLS (23.1%) was 7.57±3.91 (P<0.001), and 58.4% had poor sleep quality (χ2=6.590, P=0.010). Lastly, participants with bruxism (16.2%) had a mean PSQI score of 7.59±4.28 (P=0.003), with 66.7% experiencing poor sleep quality (χ2=11.479, P=0.001). Patients with insomnia, bruxism, and RLS exhibited higher mean PSQI scores than their counterparts, indicating that these groups had lower sleep quality levels.

Associations between sleep disorders and health-related quality of life

When assessing the relationship between sleep disorders and HRQoL using summary scores for physical and mental health components, it was observed that the average mental health QoL scores across all sleep disorders were significantly higher than those for physical health QoL. However, when evaluating physical health QoL on its own, patients with all types of sleep disorders—except for parasomnia—exhibited significantly lower scores. Conversely, patients with all sleep disorders, with the exception of RLS, had significantly lower mental health QoL scores. Additionally, individuals with RLS had the lowest PCS scores, while those with bruxism had the lowest MCS scores (Table 5).

Table 5. Association between sleep disorders and health-related QoL in cancer patients (n=333)
Sleep disorders No. SF-36 summary scores
PCS score P-value MCS score P-value
Mean±SD Mean±SD
Restless legs syndrome
 Yes 77 31.30±8.38 <0.001 39.10±7.63 0.120
 No 256 37.50±9.44 40.77±8.39
Insomnia
 Yes 98 33.51±9.13 0.002 38.46±7.67 0.006
 No 235 37.13±9.56 41.19±8.36
Parasomnia
 Yes 95 36.23±9.82 0.842 38.20±8.82 0.002
 No 238 36.00±9.48 41.27±7.85
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
 Yes 123 32.05±7.19 <0.001 38.22±7.47 <0.001
 No 210 38.42±10.00 41.65±8.42
Sleep respiratory disorders
 Yes 116 34.30±8.36 0.009 38.67±7.58 0.004
 No 217 37.01±10.04 41.30±8.45
Bruxism
 Yes 54 31.68±7.92 <0.001 36.79±7.31 <0.001
 No 279 36.92±9.63 41.08±8.24
Sleep quality
 Good sleepers (≤5 points) 136 40.20±10.08 <0.001 43.54±8.25 <0.001
 Poor sleepers (>5 points) 197 33.21±8.06 38.20±7.52

QoL, quality of life; SF-36, Short Form-36; PCS, physical component summary; MCS, mental component summary.

Download Excel Table
Sleep quality and health-related quality of life

All sub-dimensions of the SF-36 and the summary scores for the physical and mental health components were found to be significantly lower in poor sleepers. The scores for the physical and emotional role difficulty sub-dimensions were particularly impacted, markedly reducing the QoL in these patients. Poor sleep quality was found to affect the physical health component of QoL more significantly than the mental health component, as shown in Table 6. Conversely, patients classified as good sleepers had significantly higher scores in the sub-dimensions of bodily pain, social functioning, and mental health than those classified as poor sleepers. These patients also had relatively higher scores in the sub-dimensions of vitality, general health, and physical functioning.

Table 6. Association between sleep quality and health-related QoL in cancer patients (n=333)
SF-36 domains Level of sleep quality
Good sleepers (PSQI: 0−5 points) Poor sleepers (PSQI: 6−16 points) Overall SF-36 P-value
(n=181) (n=152) (n=333)
PF 52.48±34.21 34.47±26.95 44.26±32.34 <0.001
RP 40.33±44.83 8.55±23.91 25.82±40.01 <0.001
BP 61.51±24.10 42.90±22.35 53.02±25.07 <0.001
GH 53.76±18.05 41.82±17.11 48.31±18.58 <0.001
VT 54.58±19.23 40.88±17.18 48.33±19.53 <0.001
SF 62.63±25.65 46.62±23.59 55.33±25.95 <0.001
RE 47.14±45.94 15.57±33.42 32.73±43.59 <0.001
MH 62.29±15.81 51.84±14.75 57.52±16.17 <0.001
PCS 40.20±10.08 33.21±8.06 36.07±9.56 <0.001
MCS 43.54±8.25 38.20±7.52 40.38±8.24 <0.001

Values are presented as mean±SD.

QoL, quality of life; SF-36, Short Form-36; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PF, physical function; RP, role difficulty (physical); BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; VT, vitality; SF, social function; RE, role difficulty (emotional); MH, mental health; PCS, physical component summary; MCS, mental component summary.

Download Excel Table
Predictive factors of health-related quality of life

In the linear regression analysis, the PCS and MCS dimension scores are treated as dependent variables, while sleep quality, parasomnias, sleep-disordered breathing, excessive daytime sleepiness, bruxism, RLS, and insomnia are considered independent variables. Poor sleep quality and sleep disorders accounted for 50.95% (95% CI, 37.10%–64.80%; R2=0.293; P<0.001) of the deterioration in physical health QoL and 28.25% (95% CI, 15.60%–40.89%; R2=0.207; P<0.001) of the impairment in mental health QoL. Additionally, 51.65% (95% CI, 33.46%–69.84%, R2=0.291; P<0.001) of the physical health QoL deterioration and 35.26% (95% CI, 19.28%–51.23%; R2=0.283; P<0.001) of the mental health QoL impairment can be attributed to these factors.

Discussion

Key results

It has shown that people who sleep well typically have considerably higher scores in physical (average score of 40.20 compared to 33.21; with a significance level P<0.001) and mental health components (average score of 43.54 compared to 38.20; with a significance level P<0.001) than those who sleep poorly. On the other hand, individuals suffering from insomnia, daytime sleepiness, sleep-respiratory disorders, and bruxism were found to have significantly lower scores in both physical and mental health aspects. Moreover, people with RLS had notably lower physical health scores, and those with parasomnias had significantly lower mental health scores.

Interpretation/comparison with previous studies
Prevalence of sleep disorders

Our analysis of patients with various cancers showed that the most common sleep disorders were excessive daytime sleepiness (36.9%), sleep-disordered breathing (34.8%), and insomnia (29.4%). These findings align with Davidson et al. [21], who reported leg restlessness, insomnia, and excessive daytime sleepiness as most prevalent, though the order varied. Our prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness was higher than Davidson et al. [21] but lower than Jaumally et al. [14]. We found a 35.8% prevalence of sleep-related breathing disorders, notably high in patients with respiratory system cancers (43.1%). Dreher et al. [22] reported a 49% prevalence in lung cancer patients, and Huppertz et al. [23] found a 90% prevalence in head and neck cancer patients. Insomnia prevalence was 29.5%, with the highest rate (46.6%) in respiratory system cancer patients [24].

Types of cancer and sleep quality

The average PSQI score among our cancer patients was 6.17, indicating moderate sleep quality disorder. Over half (59.2%) were poor sleepers. While no significant relationship was found between cancer type and sleep quality, higher prevalence of poor sleep quality was observed in patients with respiratory system, hematological, and breast cancers. Other studies reported varying rates of poor sleep quality in lung [25] and breast [26] cancer patients, and in those with advanced cancers [27].

Relationship among sleep disorders, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life

Patients with sleep disorders had higher PSQI scores, reflecting worse sleep quality. The prevalence ranged from 16% to 37%, with bruxism and insomnia patients showing the highest PSQI scores. Cheng and Lee [28] identified insomnia as a major troubling symptom for cancer patients. Sleep disorders were linked to reduced physical health QoL, except for parasomnias. RLS and bruxism patients experienced significant declines in physical and mental health QoL, respectively [10]. Chronic insomnia can lead to neuropsychological disorders and weaken immune defenses [9].

Our study found a strong association between poor sleep quality and lower physical health QoL. Poor sleepers showed notable reductions in physical and emotional-role functioning. Linear regression analysis identified poor sleep quality as a primary factor for the decline in physical and mental health QoL. A recent study [29] found a significant negative correlation between sleep disturbances and all QoL domains, with psychological aspects more affected than physical health. Prior studies have linked sleep disorders with reduced QoL, depression [30], concentration difficulties [31], fatigue, and lower survival rates [12]. The connection between sleep problems and physical or mental health concerns remains varied, with some studies [32] finding a stronger link to physical health issues, while others [33] noted a stronger association with mental health factors.

Limitations

As mentioned in the methods section, the sampling is conventional. Only voluntary participants were included.

Suggestion for further studies

Future research should investigate patients' sleep patterns prior to medical care or the onset of illness. Furthermore, present study is a descriptive. Therefore, cohort study or randomized-controlled study is required to compare the QoL of cancer patients with sleep disorders.

Conclusion

Improving the sleep quality of cancer patients through early detection and social support is comparably important to disease treatment. Addressing factors that impact the QoL of cancer patients, such as pain, sleep disorders, fatigue, and anxiety, can lead to improvements in their QoL. Neglecting these issues; however, can have a detrimental effect on patient well-being, as these symptoms can exacerbate each other and lead to further decline. By understanding the importance of social support and motivation, healthcare professionals and family members of patients can actively contribute to alleviating sleep problems and enhancing the QoL of those affected by cancer.

Authors' contributions

Conceptualization: Temircan Z

Formal analysis: Şenol V

Investigation: Temircan Z

Methodology: Şenol V

Project administration: Temircan Z

Writing – original draft: Şenol V, Temircan Z

Writing – review & editing: Şenol V, Temircan Z

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

Data files are available from Harvard Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CMG88I

Dataset 1. Raw response data from participants

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Pelin Nar for her support, help, and guidance to make this research possible.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials are available from: https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2024.e5.

Supplement 1. Explanation of survey tools, including validity test

Supplement 2. Survey questionnaire

References

1.

Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(17):2758-2765

2.

Miladinia M, Baraz S, Ramezani M, Malehi AS. The relationship between pain, fatigue, sleep disorders and quality of life in adult patients with acute leukaemia: during the first year after diagnosis. Eur J Cancer Care. 2018; 27(1)e12762

3.

Lin CY, Cheng ASK, Nejati B, Imani V, Ulander M, Browall M, et al. A thorough psychometric comparison between Athens insomnia scale and insomnia severity index among patients with advanced cancer. J Sleep Res. 2020; 29(1)e12891

4.

Bastien CH, Vallières A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001; 2(4):297-307

5.

Scarpa M, Pinto E, Saadeh LM, Parotto M, Da Roit A, Pizzolato E, et al. Sleep disturbances and quality of life in postoperative management after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2014; 12:156

6.

Qin L, Mo YL, Li L, Wei ZJ, Zhu XD, Yin X, et al. Sleep characteristics and psychological symptoms in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma before and after intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Psychol Health Med. 2015; 20(6):662-669

7.

Morris BA, Thorndike FP, Ritterband LM, Glozier N, Dunn J, Chambers SK. Sleep disturbance in cancer patients and caregivers who contact telephone-based help services. Support Care Cancer. 2015; 23:1113-1120

8.

Foley DJ, Monjan AA, Brown SL, Simonsick EM, Wallace RB, Blazer DG. Sleep complaints among elderly persons: an epidemiologic study of three communities. Sleep. 1995; 18(6):425-432

9.

Irwin MR. Depression and insomnia in cancer: prevalence, risk factors, and effects on cancer outcomes. Curr Psychiatr Rep. 2013; 15:404

10.

Oh H, Seo Y, Jeong H, Seo W. The identification of multiple symptom clusters and their effects on functional performance in cancer patients. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21(19pt20):2832-2842

11.

Nock NL, Dimitropoulos A, Zanotti KM, Waggoner S, Nagel C, Golubic M, et al. Sleep, quality of life, and depression in endometrial cancer survivors with obesity seeking weight loss. Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28:2311-2319

12.

Bach L, Kalder M, Kostev K. Depression and sleep disorders are associated with early mortality in women with breast cancer in the United Kingdom. J Psychiatr Res. 2021; 143:481-484

13.

Irwin M, Clark C, Kennedy B, Gillin JC, Ziegler M. Nocturnal catecholamines and immune function in insomniacs, depressed patients, and control subjects. Brain Behav Immun. 2003; 17(5):365-370

14.

Jaumally BA, Das A, Cassell NC, Pachecho GN, Majid R, Bashoura L, et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness in cancer patients. Sleep Breath. 2021; 25:1063-1067

15.

Pinar R. A new aspect of health-related research: quality of life, evaluation of reliability and validity of quality-of-life survey in patients with chronic diseases. Hemsirelik Bul. 1995; 9(38):85-95.

16.

Miletin MS, Hanly PJ. Measurement properties of the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep Med. 2003; 4(3):195-199

17.

Ağargün MY, Çilli AS, Kara H, Bilici M, Telcioğlu M, Semiz ÜB, et al. Epworth Uykululuk Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Derg. 1999; 10:261-267.

18.

Netzer NC, Stoohs RA, Netzer CM, Clark K, Strohl KP. Using the Berlin Questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131(7):485-491

19.

Jenkins CD, Stanton BA, Niemcryk SJ, Rose RM. A scale for the estimation of sleep problems in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988; 41(4):313-321

20.

Ağargün MY, Kara H, Anlar Ö. Pittsburgh uyku kalitesi indeksi’nin geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Derg. 1996; 7:107-115.

21.

Davidson JR, MacLean AW, Brundage MD, Schulze K. Sleep disturbance in cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 54(9):1309-1321

22.

Dreher M, Krüger S, Schulze-Olden S, Keszei A, Storre JH, Woehrle H, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med. 2018; 18:72

23.

Huppertz T, Horstmann V, Scharnow C, Ruckes C, Bahr K, Matthias C, et al. OSA in patients with head and neck cancer is associated with cancer size and oncologic outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 278:2485-2491

24.

Bastien CH, Vallières A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001; 2(4):297-307

25.

Lou VWQ, Chen EJ, Jian H, Zhou Z, Zhu J, Li G, et al. Respiratory symptoms, sleep, and quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2017; 53(2):250-256

26.

Otte JL, Davis L, Carpenter JS, Krier C, Skaar TC, Rand KL, et al. Sleep disorders in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24:4197-4205

27.

George GC, Iwuanyanwu EC, Anderson KO, Yusuf A, Zinner RG, Piha-Paul SA, et al. Sleep quality and its association with fatigue, symptom burden, and mood in patients with advanced cancer in a clinic for early-phase oncology clinical trials. Cancer. 2016; 122(21):3401-3409

28.

Cheng KKF, Lee DTF. Effects of pain, fatigue, insomnia, and mood disturbance on functional status and quality of life of elderly patients with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011; 78(2):127-137

29.

Hofmeister D, Schulte T, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Geue K, Zenger M, Esser P, et al. The association between sleep problems and general quality of life in cancer patients and in the general population. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:960029

30.

Hofmeister D, Schulte T, Hinz A. Sleep problems in cancer patients: a comparison between the Jenkins sleep scale and the single-item sleep scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Sleep Med. 2020; 71:59-65

31.

Medysky ME, Temesi J, Culos-Reed SN, Millet GY. Exercise, sleep and cancer-related fatigue: are they related?. Neurophysiol Clin. 2017; 47(2):111-122

32.

Sandadi S, Frasure HE, Broderick MJ, Waggoner SE, Miller JA, von Gruenigen VE. The effect of sleep disturbance on quality of life in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 123(2):351-355

33.

Shi T, Min M, Sun C, Zhang Y, Liang M, Sun Y. Does insomnia predict a high risk of cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Sleep Res. 2020; 29(1)e12876