Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is the most common form of contact dermatitis and a leading cause of occupational skin disease, but remains underrecognized relative to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Direct chemical or physical injury to the epidermal barrier causes ICD, which can develop in anyone when exposure intensity or duration exceeds the skin’s repair capacity. ICD is increasingly understood to involve more than barrier disruption: it is an innate immune-mediated inflammatory disorder involving keratinocyte-derived cytokines, neutrophil recruitment, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2–C-C motif chemokine receptor 2–interleukin-1β signaling, Toll-like receptor 3, and inflammasome activation. Host factors, particularly atopic dermatitis and filaggrin loss-of-function variants, further influence susceptibility. Clinical phenotypes range from acute irritant reactions to chronic cumulative dermatitis, and occupational wet work is a major preventable exposure. Distinguishing ICD from ACD is difficult because their clinical and histopathological features overlap, they may coexist, and ICD-related barrier damage may facilitate subsequent allergic sensitization. Diagnosis therefore requires assessment of exposure history, lesion distribution, symptom quality, and temporal course, with patch testing when ACD is suspected. Molecular biomarker panels and noninvasive imaging or barrier-assessment techniques may improve diagnostic precision, but remain investigational. Management should prioritize identifying and removing irritants, reducing exposure, implementing appropriate protective measures, and restoring the epidermal barrier. Recognizing ICD as a distinct clinical entity, rather than simply a diagnosis of exclusion, is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective management of contact dermatitis in clinical practice.

Purpose
Neck pain is a leading musculoskeletal cause of disability in the United States. This study aimed to assess temporal, geographic, and demographic disparities in its burden across US states from 1990 to 2021.
Methods
Global Burden of Disease 2021 data for all 50 US states and the District of Columbia were analyzed for 1990–2021. Counts and age-standardized rates per 100,000 population for prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLD) were compared by region, state, sex, age group, and sociodemographic index (SDI) level.
Results
In 2021, neck pain accounted for 9,430,000 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 7,400,000–11,590,000) prevalent cases, 1,900,000 (95% UI, 1,490,000–2,320,000) incident cases, and 920,000 (95% UI, 620,000–1,300,000) YLD, increases of 41.17%, 37.44%, and 38.72%, respectively, from 1990. Although age-standardized incidence increased globally by 1.18% (0.07%–2.39%) over 1990–2021, the United States had small declines in age-standardized incidence (−0.11%; 95% UI, −0.18% to −0.06%), prevalence (−0.20%; 95% UI, −0.32% to −0.10%), and YLD (−1.12%; 95% UI, −2.02% to −0.22%). Neck pain rates were highest in the District of Columbia, Georgia, and Delaware and lowest in North Carolina, Alaska, and Wyoming. The burden peaked at ages 40–49 years and was higher in females. Age-standardized YLD rates for neck pain were significantly positively correlated with the SDI (Spearman’s ρ=0.601, P<0.001).
Conclusion
The geographic and demographic disparities in neck pain burden across US states indicate a need for targeted interventions.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to write and edit scientific manuscripts; however, their fluency can obscure mismatches between linguistic claim strength and evidential support. This tutorial examines such mismatches through the lens of epistemic integrity, defined as accurate alignment of scientific statements with the quality, strength, and scope of the underlying evidence. It presents sentence-level epistemic markers that require careful human judgment, including reporting verbs, hedges, tense choices, evaluative adjectives and adverbs, and local scope markers. Inappropriate modification of these features can overstate or understate certainty, strengthen or weaken a claim beyond what the evidence warrants, or distort an author’s intended emphasis. The tutorial also addresses discourse-level issues, including the need to clearly distinguish between results and interpretation, shifts in certainty across manuscript sections, consistency in scope limitations, and cumulative changes in evaluative tone. Because LLMs cannot independently assess study design, methodological limitations, disciplinary conventions, or evidential sufficiency, polished revisions may introduce epistemic miscalibration even when they are grammatically correct. Editors should therefore evaluate not only local wording but also the consistency of claims across the manuscript. Human editorial expertise remains essential for preserving rhetorical coherence, evidential accuracy, and scientific integrity in artificial intelligence–assisted academic writing, alongside attention to grammar, style, clarity, and readability.

Purpose
This study aimed to address gaps in Korean Standard Series (KSS) information, highlight allergens with increasing patch test positivity, describe potential sources encountered in daily life, and provide guidance on selecting allergen-free alternatives.
Methods
Relevant information was identified from KSS patient instruction sheets (Chemotechnique, Sweden), T.R.U.E. TEST patient instruction sheets (SmartPractice, United States), the Contact Dermatitis Institute allergen database, the American Contact Dermatitis Society allergen information sheets, and searches of the PubMed database. English-language review articles, case series, and case reports identified using keywords related to the 25 KSS allergens were selected.
Results
Information was updated for the following allergens: nickel, cobalt, potassium dichromate, balsam of Peru, paraben mix, N-isopropyl-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine, formaldehyde, p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, colophonium, imidazolidinyl urea, and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole. Emerging sources included electronic devices, personal protective equipment, including masks whose use increased during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, nail products, and children’s toy slime. In addition, occupational allergen information sheets were developed for hairdressers, healthcare workers, dentists, dental hygienists, and cooks. The Korean-language allergen sheets are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
Conclusion
Because the KSS has not been revised for more than 2 decades, emerging allergen sources may be inadequately represented in the existing patient information. Accordingly, updated patient instruction sheets were developed to improve patient understanding and facilitate the practical application of patch test results.

An 83-year-old woman presented with a 10-day history of sudden-onset diplopia in the left eye, with no preceding trauma or anticoagulant use. Initial orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on day 10 revealed a well-circumscribed retrobulbar lesion along the left inferior rectus muscle. The lesion showed heterogeneous T1 hyperintensity, low-to-intermediate T2 signal, and no definite solid enhancement, raising concern for a hemorrhagic orbital mass or neoplasm. Serial noncontrast computed tomography (CT) on days 20 and 49 showed progressive decreases in lesion size and attenuation. Follow-up MRI on day 180 confirmed complete spontaneous resolution, with no residual abnormality or underlying neoplasm. This case demonstrates that serial CT and MRI can guide safe conservative management of spontaneous retrobulbar hematoma and help avoid unnecessary surgery in clinically stable patients.

Purpose
Clinical fieldwork in genetic counseling education is constrained by limited training sites, shortages of clinical supervisors, and administrative burdens. Simulation-based learning, including role-play, has therefore been used to support development of counseling competencies. This study described the development, implementation, operational structure, and feasibility of a role-play-based practicum in a graduate genetic counseling program.
Methods
This retrospective descriptive report was based on Genetic Counseling Practicum, a spring 2024 course for 11 third-semester students in a graduate genetic counseling program in South Korea. Twenty-two role-play scenarios were developed, including 11 hereditary cancer cases and 11 pediatric or adult genetic disorder cases. The scenarios simulated pretest and posttest encounters during a 6-week, 2-block practicum. Students alternated between counselor and counselee roles, recorded sessions outside class time, and received domain-guided peer and faculty feedback.
Results
The scenarios covered patient ages from infancy to late adulthood and included somatic and germline pathogenic variants, a negative multigene panel result, and chromosomal or epigenetic abnormalities. All 22 planned sessions were completed and recorded as scheduled, and all 11 students completed their assigned sessions. The planned assignment, recording, review, and feedback procedures were completed without documented omissions. Approximately 11 scheduled class hours were devoted to feedback, and no external clinical sites or supervisors were required.
Conclusion
This study presents an operationally feasible model for a role-play-based practicum with diverse scenarios in a graduate genetic counseling curriculum. It may serve as a practical reference for programs considering similar simulation-based training.