• Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

3
results for

"Bronchoalveolar lavage"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Bronchoalveolar lavage"

Original Articles
[English]

No abstract available in English.

  • 44 View
  • 0 Download
[English]
Endothelin-l Content of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Allografted Lungs during Acute Rejection
Young-Sik Park
Ihwa Ŭidae chi 1996;19(4):493-497.   Published online July 24, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.1996.19.4.493
Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not endothelin-1 content of bronchoalveolar lavage was elevated in allografted lungs during acute rejection.

Methods

After single lung allotransplantation, dogs were immunosuppressed with triple standard therapy and divided into 2 groups. Group 1(Immunosupression ; n=4) was maintained on immunosuppression as controls. In group 2(Rejectin ; n=13), triple therapy was discontinued to induce acute rejection from postoperative day 5.

At postoperative day 9, broncholaveolar lavage was done through bronchoscopy in native unoperated lung and transplanted lung in group 1. Bronchoalveolar lavage was repeated in group 2 in the same way. Endothelin-1 content of bronchoalveolar lavage was measured by radiommunoassay.

Endothelin-1 content in transplanted lung of group 2 was compared to that of transplanted lung of group 1 and to that of native unoperated lung of group 2.

Results

Endothelin-1 content of bronchoalveolar lavage in transplanted lung of group 2 was comparable to that of group 1(42.18±26.39 vs 3.08±3.08pg/ml ; p=0.08). Endothelin-1 content of bronchoalveolar lavage in transplanted lung of group 2 was comparable to that of native unoperated lung of group 2(42.18±26.39 vs 3.74±2.62pg/ml ; p=0.07).

Conclusion

Endothelin-1 content of bronchoalveolar lavage in transplanted lung was altered during acute rejection, but without statistical significance.

  • 49 View
  • 0 Download
[English]
Objective

Experiment was designed to compare cellular profile of bronchoalveolar lavage following induced bacterial infection, acute rejection and acute rejection plus bacterial infection after lung allotranplantation.

Methods

After single lung allotransplantation, dogs were immunosuppressed with standard triple therapy and divided into 4 groups. Group I(n=4) was maintained on immunosuppression as controls. In group II(n= 6), infection was induced by bronchoscopic inoculation of E. coli at postoperative day 5. In group III(n=6), triple therapy was discontinued to induce acute rejection from postoperative day 5. In group IV(n= 8), triple therapy was discontinued and bacterial infection was induced by bronchoscopic inoculation of E coli at postoperative day 5.

At postoperative day 9, bronchoalveolar lavage was obtained in the native and transplanted lung resprctively through bronchoscopy. Total cell count and differential cell count of bronchoalveolar lavage were compared in four groups.

Results

In the native lung, there was no significant difffrence in total cell count and differential cell count in four groups. In the transplanted lung, total cell count of group II(Infection) was increased, compared to group III(Rejection) (p <0.05). In the transplanted lung, differential neutrophil count of group II(Infection) and group III(Rejection) were increased, compared to group I(Immunosuppression) (p <0.05). In the transplanted lung, differential macrophage count of group II(Infection), III(Rejection) and IV(Rejecion plus Infection) were decreased, compared to group I(Immunosuppuression) (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Cellular profile of bronchoalveolar lavage reflected the pathological process ofinfection or acute rejection following lung allotransplantation in the transplanted lung. But conventional total and differential cell counts had limitation to differentiate either process.

  • 40 View
  • 0 Download
TOP