• Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Growing Trend of Medical Students in Utilizing Electronic Devices for Studying

The Ewha Medical Journal 2019;42(1):1-5. Published online: January 29, 2019

Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

1Department of Anatomy, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Jung-A Shin. Department of Anatomy, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul 07985, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2650-2645, Fax: 82-2-2650-5711, sja@ewha.ac.kr
• Received: December 10, 2018   • Revised: January 8, 2018   • Accepted: January 8, 2018

Copyright © 2019. Ewha Womans University School of Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 80 Views
  • 1 Download
next
  • Objectives
    There is a growing trend of medical students using electronic devices for studying. This paper analyzes such trend and assesses if the utilization of devices is adequate to effectively help students to study.
  • Methods
    Survey of total 155 medical students about the usage of the electronic devices for studying during the first year of medical school was done. The answers were matched with their exam scores in the first year.
  • Results
    Most of students were using a device, as a learning tool and the most important purpose of it was its convenience, especially for taking notes during lectures. However, students who didn't use a device when they learned anatomy or who studied with the printouts showed a tendency of receiving better scores on exams.
  • Conclusion
    Utilizing electronic devices for studying tends to be more convenient, but not effective for studying anatomy.
This work was supported by the Ewha Womans University Research Grant of 2018, and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1C1B1011306).
  • 1. Kwon N, Lee J, Chung E, Chang G, Yoon H. Comparative analyses of the uses of information and information technologies in the everyday life of undergraduate and graduate students majoring science and engineering. J Korean Soc Inf Manage 2013;30:269-295.
  • 2. Lee J, Kim Y. Examining structural relationships among self-regulated learning, flow, satisfaction, and continuous intention to use smart learning. J Educ Res 2015;13:127-150.
  • 3. Ryan D. Using tablet technology for personalizing learning. J Res Spec Educ Needs 2016;16:1071-1077.
  • 4. Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business; 2016.
  • 5. Chung JY. A study on the design of personal learning system preparing for the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Polit Educ 2017;24:53-72.
  • 6. Peverly ST, Vekaria PC, Reddington LA, Sumowski JF, Johnson KR, Ramsay CM. The relationship of handwriting speed, working memory, language comprehension and outlines to lecture note-taking and test-taking among college students. Appl Cogn Psychol 2013;27:115-126.
  • 7. Bui DC, Myerson J, Hale S. Note-taking with computers: exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. J Educ Psychol 2013;105:299-309.
  • 8. Stacy EM, Cain J. Note-taking and handouts in the digital age. Am J Pharm Educ 2015;79:107.
  • 9. Mueller PA, Oppenheimer DM. The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychol Sci 2014;25:1159-1168.
  • 10. Stephens A. The Benefits of hand-written versus digital notetaking in college lectures. Lexia: Undergraduate Journal in Writing, Rhetoric & Technical Communication. 2017.
  • 11. Joewono M, Karmaya IN, Wirata G, Yuliana , Widianti IGA, Wardana IN. Drawing method can improve musculoskeletal anatomy comprehension in medical faculty student. Anat Cell Biol 2018;51:14-18.
Fig. 1

Average anatomy exam score of the participants who did use or did not use a device for notetaking during the lecture. Average exam score of non-users (341.4±4.28) is higher than that of device users (325.2±3.85) by 16.22 (P=0.006). *P<0.05.

emj-42-1-g001.jpg
Fig. 2

Average anatomy exam score of the participants who completely or partially or never use a device for reviewing the lecture. Average exam score of the participants who don't use a device when reviewing the lecture is higher than the rest of the groups, showing a tendency of non-device-users receiving better exam scores on anatomy.

emj-42-1-g002.jpg
Table 1

The purpose of the purchase and the reason for notetaking with a device

emj-42-1-i001.jpg
Table 2

Questions related to the attitudes to using a device for learning

emj-42-1-i002.jpg
Table 3

Statistics for results embryology and anatomy tests

SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of mean.

emj-42-1-i003.jpg
Table 4

Statistics for results embryology and anatomy tests

SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of mean.

emj-42-1-i004.jpg

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      Growing Trend of Medical Students in Utilizing Electronic Devices for Studying
      Ewha Med J. 2019;42(1):1-5.   Published online January 29, 2019
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Growing Trend of Medical Students in Utilizing Electronic Devices for Studying
      Ewha Med J. 2019;42(1):1-5.   Published online January 29, 2019
      Close

      Figure

      • 0
      • 1
      Growing Trend of Medical Students in Utilizing Electronic Devices for Studying
      Image Image
      Fig. 1 Average anatomy exam score of the participants who did use or did not use a device for notetaking during the lecture. Average exam score of non-users (341.4±4.28) is higher than that of device users (325.2±3.85) by 16.22 (P=0.006). *P<0.05.
      Fig. 2 Average anatomy exam score of the participants who completely or partially or never use a device for reviewing the lecture. Average exam score of the participants who don't use a device when reviewing the lecture is higher than the rest of the groups, showing a tendency of non-device-users receiving better exam scores on anatomy.
      Growing Trend of Medical Students in Utilizing Electronic Devices for Studying

      The purpose of the purchase and the reason for notetaking with a device

      Questions related to the attitudes to using a device for learning

      Statistics for results embryology and anatomy tests

      SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of mean.

      Statistics for results embryology and anatomy tests

      SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of mean.

      Table 1 The purpose of the purchase and the reason for notetaking with a device

      Table 2 Questions related to the attitudes to using a device for learning

      Table 3 Statistics for results embryology and anatomy tests

      SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of mean.

      Table 4 Statistics for results embryology and anatomy tests

      SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of mean.

      TOP