• Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

3
results for

"Neoadjuvant therapy"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Neoadjuvant therapy"

Review

[English]
Non‑operative management, particularly the watch and wait (WW) strategy, has emerged as an alternative to total mesorectal excision for selected patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant treatment. This narrative review examines oncologic outcomes, functional and quality‑of‑life benefits, diagnostic challenges, and surveillance requirements associated with WW compared to radical surgery. Evidence from randomized trials and international registries indicates that WW provides overall and disease-free survival rates comparable to those of surgery, provided that stringent selection criteria and intensive surveillance are maintained for 3 to 5 years. Local regrowth occurs in 15%–40% of patients—most commonly within 24 months—but salvage surgery is curative in over 90% of cases and restores oncologic equivalence. Nevertheless, distant metastasis is more frequent in patients who experience regrowth, underscoring the importance of early detection and the need for optimized systemic therapy. Accurate determination of cCR remains the primary limitation; digital rectal examination, high‑resolution magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopy, even when combined, cannot reliably exclude microscopic residual disease. Total neoadjuvant therapy increases cCR rates to 30%–60% and expands the pool of WW candidates, but also intensifies the need for standardized response definitions and surveillance algorithms. WW offers organ preservation and quality‑of‑life improvements without compromising survival in carefully selected patients, provided that multidisciplinary teams ensure rigorous response assessment and lifelong monitoring. Future advances in imaging, molecular biomarkers, and individualized risk stratification are expected to further enhance the safety of WW and expand eligibility to a broader patient population.
  • 124 View
  • 2 Download

Review Articles: Special Drafts for Colorectal and Anal Diseases

[English]
Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Chan Wook Kim
Ewha Med J 2022;45(4):e8.   Published online October 31, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2022.e8
ABSTRACT

The rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) has altered. Early-onset CRC patients are increasing, and it is one of the main causes of cancer-related death. Based on epidemiologic change, the CRC screening program needs to be changed. To increase compliance, non-invasive screening techniques are developed. Although CRC survival has increased, the oncologic prognosis of metastatic CRC is remains poor. Even in metastatic CRC, which is the most difficult to treat, attempts are being made to increase the survival rate by active surgical therapy with the creation of chemotherapeutic regimens and targeted treatment based on genomic information. Due to the introduction of aggressive chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapy based on genomic features, and improvements in surgical technique, the role of surgical treatment in metastatic CRC has expanded. Metastatic CRC surgery was indicated for liver, lung, and even peritoneal seeding. Local ablation therapy was also effectively used for liver and lung metastasis. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy were tried for peritoneal seeding and demonstrated good results in a subgroup of patients, although the right indication was carefully assessed. At the same time, one of the key goals of treatment for CRC was to maintain functional outcomes. Neoadjuvant treatment, in particular, helped rectal cancer patients preserve functional results while maintaining oncologic safety. Rectal cancer organ preservation techniques are now being researched heavily in a variety of neoadjuvant treatment settings, including immunotherapy and whole neoadjuvant therapy. Precision medicine based on patient and disease characteristics is currently being used for the diagnosis and treatment of CRC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Weighing the benefits of lymphadenectomy in early-stage colorectal cancer
    Seung Min Baik, Ryung-Ah Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 245.     CrossRef
  • 538 View
  • 6 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Review Article
[English]

Local recurrence was reduced considerably due to the introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, certain proportions of patients would experience local recurrence inevitably; the lateral pelvic lymph node is the primary site of rectal cancer recurrence even after administering neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. It remains unknown whether lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis is considered as a locoregional disease or a distant metastasis. Although the oncologic stance of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis is controversial, there is increasing research interest in evaluating the conditional benefit of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in a subgroup of patients. Researchers reported an improvement in local control in patients with clinically suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis before/or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy who underwent lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the indication, diagnostic method, and extent of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Weighing the benefits of lymphadenectomy in early-stage colorectal cancer
    Seung Min Baik, Ryung-Ah Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 245.     CrossRef
  • 485 View
  • 3 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
TOP